Quantcast
Channel: Intel® Software - Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives
Viewing all 1489 articles
Browse latest View live

ippsThreshold_GT_64f fails for NAN values in 64-bit architecture

$
0
0

Hi,

so my software started crashing, eventually pinpointed ippsThreshold_GT_64f - unlike normal comparison or ippsThreshold_GT_32f, it doesn't work with NANs. It just keeps them NAN.


Problems with IPP dispatcher in C++ project

$
0
0

We've found that pure C programs linked with the standard ipp library names - eg ipps - can be built on a machine with one hardware profile, and then run successfully on another.

However, binaries compiled with g++ only work on machines with the same processor type as the machine they were built on. They will run, but the just hang with 100% CPU usage.

If, instead, we explicitly specify the IPP library for the target architecture - eg  ippsvmx - when building with g++, it runs successfully on the target machine. Of course, in this case, it has problems on any other architecture.

Is this a known issue? Is there some way around it, or is IPP simply not portable for C++ programs?

LZO functions lisence

$
0
0

I have one doubt about LZO compression functions in IPP.
According to IPP reference manual, original library of IPP LZO is code of http://www.oberhumer.com/ .
I got LZO code (ver2.09, OpenSource version) and I read the document.

I found below sentences in explanation of LZO.

> The LZO algorithms and implementations are copyrighted OpenSource
> distributed under the GNU General Public License.

If I use LZO function of IPP in my product, it is not clear for me whether I must publish my source code.
It is mentioned that "LZO algorihtms" is applied GPL.

In my understanding, even if I use LZO feature in IPP, it is not needed to publish my source code and library.

Is it right ? 

Apply Filter on Image Using "In Place"

$
0
0

Hello,

I know that as a policy you removed all the "In Place" function in Intel IPP.
I'm talking about the Image Processing domain functions.

I was wondering though, what would happen if I send the pointer as destination and source?
Should the current function work? Which might fail?

I'm asking specifically on the Column / Row Filter.
Should it work?
Should other work?
Could you publish a list of functions which should perform correctly in this case?

Thank You.

Canny Edge Detector

$
0
0

Hi, I have some problems width canny edge detector using IPP

I make three steps:

I have 3-channel image(byte array), that ordered like this RGBRGB...

The first step is applying grayScale filter.

The second is calculation gradients dx and dy using IPP vertical and horizontal Sobel filters with border, 

The last step is using ippiCanny

Code:

unsigned char * RGBToGrayScaleIpp(unsigned char * src, int width, int height, int channels)
{
    IppiSize ROI = {width, height};
    Ipp8u *GrayScaleImg = new Ipp8u[width * height];
    ippiRGBToGray_8u_C3C1R(src, width * channels * sizeof(Ipp8u), GrayScaleImg, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), ROI);
    return GrayScaleImg;
}

extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) unsigned char* __stdcall Canny(unsigned char * img, int channels, int width, int height)
{

    Ipp8u *GrayScaleImg = RGBToGrayScaleIpp(img, width, height, channels);

    IppiSize roiSize = {width - 1, height - 1};

    int horizBufferSize, vertBufferSize;
    
    IppiMaskSize maskSize = ippMskSize3x3;
    ippiFilterSobelVertGetBufferSize_8u16s_C1R(roiSize, maskSize, &vertBufferSize);
    ippiFilterSobelHorizGetBufferSize_8u16s_C1R(roiSize, maskSize, &horizBufferSize);

    Ipp8u *horizBuffer = ippsMalloc_8u(horizBufferSize);
    Ipp8u *vertBuffer = ippsMalloc_8u(vertBufferSize);

    Ipp16s *dx = new Ipp16s[width * height];
    Ipp16s *dy = new Ipp16s[width * height];

    ippiFilterSobelVertBorder_8u16s_C1R(GrayScaleImg, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), dx, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), roiSize, maskSize, ippBorderRepl, 0, vertBuffer);
    ippiFilterSobelHorizBorder_8u16s_C1R(GrayScaleImg, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), dy, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), roiSize, maskSize, ippBorderRepl, 0, horizBuffer);

    Ipp8u *buffer;
    if (vertBufferSize < horizBufferSize)
    {
        ippiCannyGetSize(roiSize, &horizBufferSize);
        buffer = ippsMalloc_8u(horizBufferSize);
    }
    else
    {
        ippiCannyGetSize(roiSize, &vertBufferSize);
        buffer = ippsMalloc_8u(vertBufferSize);
    }

    
    Ipp32f low=100.0f, high=100.0f;
    Ipp8u* dst = new Ipp8u[width * height];
    ippiCanny_16s8u_C1R(dx, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), dy, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), dst, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), roiSize, low, high, buffer);

    ippsFree(buffer);

    return dst;

}

I get incorrect result. In attach files there are 3 images source, filtered using .NET Aforge and filtered using IPP. Can you see any mistakes in my code? Please, help.

 

Canny Edge Detector

$
0
0

Hi, I have some problems width canny edge detector using IPP

I make three steps:

I have 3-channel image(byte array), that ordered like this RGBRGB...

The first step is applying grayScale filter.

The second is calculation gradients dx and dy using IPP vertical and horizontal Sobel filters with border, 

The last step is using ippiCanny

Code:

unsigned char * RGBToGrayScaleIpp(unsigned char * src, int width, int height, int channels)
{
    IppiSize ROI = {width, height};
    Ipp8u *GrayScaleImg = new Ipp8u[width * height];
    ippiRGBToGray_8u_C3C1R(src, width * channels * sizeof(Ipp8u), GrayScaleImg, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), ROI);
    return GrayScaleImg;
}

extern "C" __declspec(dllexport) unsigned char* __stdcall Canny(unsigned char * img, int channels, int width, int height)
{

    Ipp8u *GrayScaleImg = RGBToGrayScaleIpp(img, width, height, channels);

    IppiSize roiSize = {width - 1, height - 1};

    int horizBufferSize, vertBufferSize;
    
    IppiMaskSize maskSize = ippMskSize3x3;
    ippiFilterSobelVertGetBufferSize_8u16s_C1R(roiSize, maskSize, &vertBufferSize);
    ippiFilterSobelHorizGetBufferSize_8u16s_C1R(roiSize, maskSize, &horizBufferSize);

    Ipp8u *horizBuffer = ippsMalloc_8u(horizBufferSize);
    Ipp8u *vertBuffer = ippsMalloc_8u(vertBufferSize);

    Ipp16s *dx = new Ipp16s[width * height];
    Ipp16s *dy = new Ipp16s[width * height];

    ippiFilterSobelVertBorder_8u16s_C1R(GrayScaleImg, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), dx, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), roiSize, maskSize, ippBorderRepl, 0, vertBuffer);
    ippiFilterSobelHorizBorder_8u16s_C1R(GrayScaleImg, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), dy, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), roiSize, maskSize, ippBorderRepl, 0, horizBuffer);

    Ipp8u *buffer;
    if (vertBufferSize < horizBufferSize)
    {
        ippiCannyGetSize(roiSize, &horizBufferSize);
        buffer = ippsMalloc_8u(horizBufferSize);
    }
    else
    {
        ippiCannyGetSize(roiSize, &vertBufferSize);
        buffer = ippsMalloc_8u(vertBufferSize);
    }

    
    Ipp32f low=100.0f, high=100.0f;
    Ipp8u* dst = new Ipp8u[width * height];
    ippiCanny_16s8u_C1R(dx, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), dy, (width - 1) * sizeof(Ipp16s), dst, width * sizeof(Ipp8u), roiSize, low, high, buffer);

    ippsFree(buffer);

    return dst;

}

I get incorrect result. In attach files there are 3 images source, filtered using .NET Aforge and filtered using IPP. Can you see any mistakes in my code? Please, help.

 

AttachmentSize
Downloadaforge.jpg28.31 KB
Downloadipp.jpg12.95 KB
Downloadsource.jpg4.74 KB

error LNK1104: libmmt.lib

$
0
0

h files and *.lib file from another developer.
I have built a C++/CLI project and I want to create a C# wrapper for two functions

I'm getting this error

    error LNK1104: cannot open file 'libmmt.lib'    

I understand the he is using Intel Compiler and I know he uses IPP functions.<Br>
from here:<br>
https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/libraries-provided-by-intelr-c...

I understand that he also uses Multi-threaded 
static library (/MT) version of math library.

I have Intel parallel studio installed. can you please help me understand how to configure my C++/CLI project?

I have added 
$(ICPP_COMPILER15)compiler\lib\intel64 into Additional Library Directories inside Linker -> General and now I have many more errors:

    error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol ippsSum_32f referenced in function ia_cp_robustMest

    error LNK2019: unresolved external symbol ippsSubC_32f referenced in function ia_cp_estimaSigmaRob

and so on...

 

Remap function, OpenCV, speed up

$
0
0

Hello,

I am using OpenCV remap function.

But i need more speed up for my application.

Does OpenCV with IPP supports remap acceleration?

Here i can't see remap function: http://opencv.org/opencv-3-0-alpha.html

If IPP has fast remap function like opencv remap(src_mat, dst_mat, map_x, map_y), where i can see examples and try it?

Best regards Viktor.


missing function overloads in 9.0 Beta?

$
0
0

 

I am building a project that worked fine with IPP 8.0, but compilation fails with 9.0 Beta

1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(622): error C3861: 'ippiFilterRow_32f_C3R': identifier not found
1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(655): error C3861: 'ippiFilterColumn_32f_C3R': identifier not found
1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(731): error C3861: 'ippiFilter_32f_C1R': identifier not found
1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(1098): error C3861: 'ippiWarpAffine_32f_C1R': identifier not found
1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(1338): error C3861: 'ippiWarpAffine_32f_C1R': identifier not found
1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(1375): error C3861: 'ippiRotateCenter_8u_C1R': identifier not found
1>d:\apama\src\libs\utils\apfilter.cpp(1426): error C3861: 'ippiRotateCenter_32f_C1R': identifier not found

When I look in ippi.h, these functions are missing - but they are there in 8.0.

For example, in 8.0 there were 15 overloads of 'ippiFilterRow_xxx_xxx, there is now only one,

IPPAPI( IppStatus, ippiFilterRow_64f_C1R, ( const Ipp64f* pSrc, int srcStep,
        Ipp64f* pDst, int dstStep, IppiSize dstRoiSize, const Ipp64f* pKernel,
        int kernelSize, int xAnchor ))

Were they deprecated?

 

 

 

Problem with FilterBilateralBorder

$
0
0

Hi,

I tried to use ippiFilterBilateralBorder_32f_C1R and got incorrect results.
Then I have run an example from the manual for ippiFilterBilateralBorder_8u_C1R (copy-paste) but have gotten different, incorrect results too (below).

 1   2   3 123 123 125  54  54
 3   4   5 128 130 130  61  62
 4   5   6 131 132 133  64  65
 6   6   6 132 133 133  66  66
 7   7   6 133 133 132  66  66
 7   6   5 133 132 131  66  65
 6   5   4 132 131 130  65  64

I am using IPP 8.1.0 under 64-bits Win 7 Pro SP-1 and MS Visual Studio Pro 2013.

Integrated Performance Primitives samples

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I've noticed that the speec-codec samples are no longer available with the latest version of the IPP libraries.

Are these samples still available? Or are they no longer supported with the 8.0+ versions?

Is there a Matrix Set?

$
0
0

I'm looking at converting from a different library to Intel ones so I'm looking at function analogues.

There are vector set functsions( ippsSet_???), but I was wondering if there was an analogue for matrices, preferable for complex data.

ippsDotProd_32f Performance on Haswell CPU

$
0
0

Hi,

at the moment I'm using ippsDotProd_32f in IPP 7.0 quite extensively in one of my projects. I now tested IPP 8.2 on a Haswell CPU (Xeon e5-2650 v3 in a HP z640 workstation) with this project because I expected it to be significantly faster (see below). Actually, the code was about 10% slower using IPP 8.2 which I found quite disturbing.

I created a test program (see below) to verify this and found that ippsDotProd_32f (as well as some other functions) seem to be slower in IPP 8.2 as compared to IPP 7.0 if one uses a lot but rather small arrays of about 100 entries. For larger arrays the speed seems to be equal.

Unfortunately this is exactly what I have to do in my project. Now two questions arise:

 

1. What can I do to make my code work at least with the speed of IPP 7.0 event if I use IPP 8.2

2. Why is ippsDotProd_32f on a Haswell CPU not actually significantly faster? My assumptions are based on this article (section 3.1):

https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-xeon-processor-e5-2600-v...
 

Where it is stated that Haswell CPUs have two FMA units and therefore should be much faster calculating dot products. Furthermore it is stated in https://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/haswell-support-in-intel-ipp that ippsDotProd_32f should actually profit from this fact, at least in IPP versions larger 7.0

 

I'm very thankful for assistance here! Apparently I understood something wrong? Here is my test code, it was compiled with Visual Studio 2012 on a non-Haswell-computer but the tests were run on the mentioned Haswell-system:

 

#include "stdafx.h"
#include "windows.h"
#include "ipp.h"
#include "ipps.h"
#include "ippcore.h"



int main(int argc, _TCHAR* argv[])
{

	IppStatus IPP_Init_status;
	IPP_Init_status=ippInit();
	printf("%s\n", ippGetStatusString(IPP_Init_status) );
	const IppLibraryVersion *lib;
	lib = ippsGetLibVersion();
	printf("%s %s\n", lib->Name, lib->Version);
	//ippSetNumThreads(1);

	//generate two vectors
	float* vec1;
	float* vec2;
	vec1=new float[1000]();
	vec2=new float[1000]();

	//fill vectors with values
	for (int i=0;i<1000;i++){
		vec1[i]=(float)i;
		vec2[i]=(float)(1000-i);
	}


	//result variable
	float dotprod_result=0.f;


	//start timing
	int dotprod_time=0;
	LARGE_INTEGER StartingTime, EndingTime, ElapsedMicroseconds;
    LARGE_INTEGER Frequency;
    QueryPerformanceFrequency(&Frequency);
    QueryPerformanceCounter(&StartingTime);


	//run ippsDotProd
	for (int i=0; i<500000000; i++){
		//ippsSum_32f(vec1,1000, &dotprod_result,ippAlgHintFast);
		ippsDotProd_32f(vec1, vec1, 100, &dotprod_result);
	}


	//stop timing
	QueryPerformanceCounter(&EndingTime);
    ElapsedMicroseconds.QuadPart = EndingTime.QuadPart - StartingTime.QuadPart;
    ElapsedMicroseconds.QuadPart *= 1000000;
    ElapsedMicroseconds.QuadPart /= Frequency.QuadPart;
    dotprod_time=(int)(ElapsedMicroseconds.QuadPart/1000);

	printf("Total time [ms]:  %d\n", dotprod_time);



	delete[] vec1;
	delete[] vec2;

	return 0;
}

 

The result for IPP 7.0:

ippStsNoErr: No errors, it's OK.
ippse9-7.0.dll 7.0 build 205.105
Total time [ms]:  7558

 

The result for IPP 8.2:

ippStsNoErr: No errors.
ippSP AVX2 (l9) 8.2.1 (r44077)
Total time [ms]:  8141

 

 

 

 

h264 library license

$
0
0

Dear all,

I would like to use "h264_dec_filter.dll" and "h264_enc_filter.dll" (which could be use to register by regsvr32 ) to create the Direct Show project for commercial application. I do not know whether if they are free to use or not. If I have to pay license fee to use them, how much do I have to pay?

Thanks and Best Regards.

ChuyenLuong

FilterLaplace generates different results when running the 32-Bit vs. 64-Bit

$
0
0

We have observed different results when running the FilterLaplace function between the 32-bit and the 64-bit version of the IPP libraries.
Specifically we are calling: ippiFilterLaplace_8u_AC4R with both 3X3 and 5X5 kernels.
The binary results differ between the 32 and 64 bit libraries.  Is this expected?  We are currently running IPP 7.0.

Many thanks,

Brian


Software Evaluation question

$
0
0

I would like to evaluate the speech coding samples of the Intel IPP librairies.

I have downloaded the 30-day evaluation of Parallel Studio XE Composer Edition for Fortran and C++ Linux*. Is this the correct package?

I understand that the speech coding sample is deprecated, however I am confused as there is an entry called Speech Coding Functions (https://software.intel.com/en-us/node/502412) in the  Reference Manual for Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives 8.2 Update 2.

It even gives a link to the  Intel IPP Speech Coding Samples:

The use of the Intel IPP speech coding functions is demonstrated in Intel IPP Samples. See Intel IPP Speech Coding Samples downloadable from http://www.intel.com/cd/software/products/asmo-na/eng/220046.htm.

However, this link does not seem to work.

 

Is it possible to try the speech coding samples  with an evaluation copy of the Intel® Integrated Performance Primitives?

 

Thank you,

Louis.

Converting from pixel order YCbCr411 to BGR

$
0
0

Hi all,

I'm new to using the IPP library and  I'm having trouble converting from pixel order YCbCr411 data to BGR format.  From reading the documentation, I know that I first need to convert the pixel order to planar format first before calling the the library function ippiYCbCr411ToBGR_8u_P3C4R to convert planar YCbCr411 data to BGR format. I see that I can probably use the ippiCopy_8u_C3P3R call to convert my image buffer from pixel order to planar order. 

For example, is this the following the correct approach?

int pDstStep[3];
Ipp8u* pFirst = ippiMalloc_8u_C1(srcCols, srcRows, &pDstStep[0]);
Ipp8u* pSecond = ippiMalloc_8u_C1(srcCols/4, srcRows, &pDstStep[1]);
Ipp8u* pThird = ippiMalloc_8u_C1(srcCols/4, srcRows, &pDstStep[2]);

Ipp8u* pDst[3] = { pFirst, pSecond, pThird };

 ippiCopy_8u_C3P3R((Ipp8u*)pImageBuffer,
            pImageBufferStride,
            pDst,
            srcCols,
            imgSize);

// Convert from 3 plane YCbCr411 source image to BGR
ippiYCbCr411ToBGR_8u_P3C4R(const unsigned char**)(&pDst),
            pDstStep,
            pDestBuffer,
            destStride,
            imgSize,
            0);

Thanks!

Converting from pixel to planar format

$
0
0

Hi,

I'm having trouble converting 4:1:1 pixel format to planar P3 format.  What are the functions that I can use for this conversion? 

Thanks,

 

performance issue ippiCrossCorrNorm_8u32f_C1R

$
0
0

Hello

I compared the ipp703 call ippiCrossCorrValid_NormLevel_8u32f_C1R

to the 802 call ippiCrossCorrNorm_8u32f_C1R

and measured Timing in endless Loops (all buffers pre-allocated, 1000x1000 Image, 10x10 template)

Results s. Attachment

First Trial: in the Loop a sleep(0) directive was used

The 703 turns out to be 4x faster (!) than the new 802 function, but cpu load is extreme and would not give space to other Tasks in complex applications

Second Trial: in the Loop a sleep(100) directive was used

The 703 still Shows an extremly high cpu load though my calculated cpu use time is only at 5% !! 802 works as expected with few remaining load.

 

Now what shall i do ? I don´t want to use 703 because it seems to be bugous that cpu load is constantly high even after the call finished and the thread is sleeping. The 802 Performance is way poorer however.

Stefan

Updated from IPP 7.1.1 to 8.2.1, seeing segmentation faults on AVX (e9)

$
0
0

We have been using the Intel IPP's for many years now (Dialogic was once an Intel Company :)).  A few years back we updated to version 7.1.1 and all was well until we ran into some segmentation faults on certain newer systems.  The crashes were on systems which supported AVX and AVX2 processors. We found that we were able to work around this by limiting the CPU type to AVX.

We recently updated to IPP 8.2.1 hoping that this limitation would no longer be required.  However, we are seeing more frequent segmentation faults on systems which support AVX using the e9 IPP functions.

First, in the crypto libraries.  This was from when we were originally using the deprecated functions.  Updating to the newer AES API's did not resolve this issue.

Apr 30 08:58:46 sut-1330 kernel: [6765] trap invalid opcode ip:7fe0be224e7a sp:7fde82bc8b80 error:0 in 

#0 0x00007fe0be224e7a in e9_EncryptCTR_RIJ128pipe_AES_NI () from /usr/dialogic/data/ssp.mlm
#1 0x00007fde82bc8cd0 in ?? ()
#2 0x00007fe0be22425d in e9_ippsRijndael128EncryptCTR () from /usr/dialogic/data/ssp.mlm

Second . . . 

#0 0x00007fb554d4cee1 in e9_owniCopyReplicateBorder_8u_C1R ()

Debug I added indicating the IPP settings being used . . .

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: APInit.c.162:DisplayIPPCPUFeatures: 0x46 : 0x46

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: APInit.c.175:DisplayIPPCPUFeatures: Limiting from 0x46 to 0x46

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ippCore 8.2.1 (r44077)

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ippIP AVX (e9) 8.2.1 (r44077)

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ippSP AVX (e9) 8.2.1 (r44077)

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ippVC AVX (e9) 8.2.1 (r44077)

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: Processor supports Advanced Vector Extensions instruction set

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot:     8 cores on die

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ippGetMaxCacheSizeB 20480 k

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: Available 0xfdf Enabled 0xfdf

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: MMX       A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SSE       A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SSE2      A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SSE3      A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SSSE3     A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: MOVBE     X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SSE41     A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SSE42     A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: AVX       A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: AVX(OS)   A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: AES       A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: CLMUL     A E

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ABR       X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: RDRRAND   X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: F16C      X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: AVX2      X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: ADCOX     X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: RDSEED    X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: PREFETCHW X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: SHA       X X

Apr 30 08:57:07 sut-1330 ssp_x86Linux_boot: KNC       X X

 

We use gcc for building our product which links with the IPP libs.

gcc (GCC) 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-46)
Copyright (C) 2006 Free Software Foundation, Inc.

redhat-release-5Server-5.4.0.3
redhat-release-notes-5Server-29

 

 

Viewing all 1489 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>